|
security
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Anonymous and NTLMI have a customer requirement where they would like to alllow certain
users to use NTLM as they enter our secure site while others would login through a web form. The desired action would be to check the interactive user's credentials upon entry to the site then compare it to an ACL we have. If they are not in this list they would be redirected to the web form login. It appears to me that enabling both Anonymous and NTLM is IIS will use the lowest credentials needed to complete a given resource request. IT would seem that the goal of this requirement could be met by denying access to the initial page to IUSR_<servername> account and then redirecting in ASP code on failure but this would seem to be less than ellegant at best. Can anyone offer a suggestion as to how the initial resource can be left unsecured yet have the server challenge for credentials anyway? This is by design, browsers will always attempt to connect anonymously, and
base on authentication challenge header receive from web server, it will then proceed with next supported auth method. refer this kb INFO: How IIS Authenticates Browser Clients http://support.microsoft.com/?id=264921 -- Show quoteHide quoteRegards, Bernard Cheah http://www.microsoft.com/iis/ http://www.iiswebcastseries.com/ http://www.msmvps.com/bernard/ <rgmul***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1118701316.418324.33580@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >I have a customer requirement where they would like to alllow certain > users to use NTLM as they enter our secure site while others would > login through a web form. The desired action would be to check the > interactive user's credentials upon entry to the site then compare it > to an ACL we have. If they are not in this list they would be > redirected to the web form login. > > It appears to me that enabling both Anonymous and NTLM is IIS will use > the lowest credentials needed to complete a given resource request. IT > would seem that the goal of this requirement could be met by denying > access to the initial page to IUSR_<servername> account and then > redirecting in ASP code on failure but this would seem to be less than > ellegant at best. > > Can anyone offer a suggestion as to how the initial resource can be > left unsecured yet have the server challenge for credentials anyway? >
Problem w/ Integrated Auth -- Receiving User/Pass dialog box against IIS6
integrated vs basic Accessing Site as Anonymous 401.3 on IIS after SP1 ASP.NET app permissions Passing User Credentials to site running under Integrated Security Logging into website - remove log in box Server attack - info please? Can't get rid of localstart.asp Most secure solution for ftp (IIS?) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||