|
security
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
WebPermission.Demand() is failing with membership condition - Strong NameI'm trying to run an assembly in internet explorer (local mode - smart client architecture). I need to secure the running, so the first step is protecting the URL. In .net framework 2.0 configuration I go to ->runtime security policy - > Machine -> Code Groups I adding new code group. In the security permissions the Assert is Yes, and the membershipcondition is URL with http://127.0.0.1/* , and then the following code is working: WebPermission webPerm = new WebPermission(PermissionState.Unrestricted); webPerm.Demand(); The second step is protecting it more with the Strong name of the assembly. In .net framework 2.0 configuration I go to ->runtime security policy - > Machine -> new Code Groups, and the membership condition is Strong Name with the public key of the assembly. The following code isfailed: WebPermission webPerm = new WebPermission(PermissionState.Unrestricted); webPerm.Demand(); this code is also failing: WebPermission webPerm = new WebPermission(PermissionState.Unrestricted); webPerm.Assert(); // bypass the AppDomain level in stackwalk webPerm.Demand(); what I need to do for solving this problem? Thank you, Dov ok, I made a mystake,
there is no point to call demand after assert, the assert "pass" the application about the specific permission set. If I want to add another permission sets like SocketPermission, I have problem because you can do assert only to one permission set. If I'm doing RevertAssert its not good also, so maybe anyone know how to assert more than one permission set ??? Thanks create a PermissionSet and add all the needed permissions to it.
PermissionSet ps = new PermissionSet(); ps.AddPermission (...); the call Assert on the set ps.Assert(); ----- Dominick Baier (http://www.leastprivilege.com) Developing More Secure Microsoft ASP.NET 2.0 Applications (http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/9989.asp) Show quote > ok, I made a mystake, > there is no point to call demand after assert, the assert "pass" the > application about the specific permission set. > If I want to add another permission sets like SocketPermission, I have > problem because you can do assert only to one permission set. > If I'm doing RevertAssert its not good also, > so maybe anyone know how to assert more than one permission set ??? > Thanks > |
|||||||||||||||||||||||