|
security
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CAS Permission SetsHi,
Can someone clarify the difference between the FullTrust and the Everything permission sets? I know that a FullTrust assembly will not undergo permission checking, but why give an assembly Everything permissions, when you could omit checking altogether with the FullTrust set? Thanks, Jeppe D. Jespersen Denmark "Jeppe Dige Jespersen" <jdj_@_jdj.dk> wrote in message The biggest difference is that FullTrust isn't really set of defined news:eIiMWxwnFHA.2472@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > Hi, > > Can someone clarify the difference between the FullTrust and the > Everything permission sets? permissions. Instead, it's essentially a marker that the assembly should pass any permission demand. On the other hand, Everything is a normal permission set that defines a list of permissions that happens to contain essentially all of permissions included in the core .NET Framework, with the exception of SecurityPermission\SkipVerification. Any additional permissions that might happen to be installed on the machine (say, a custom permission that you might create) will not be included in the Everthing group. > I know that a FullTrust assembly will not undergo permission checking, This is not correct. Assemblies with a FullTrust grant are subjected to permission checking. They simply pass any permission demand (with the exception of demands for identity permissions in the v. 1.x framework). > but why give an assembly Everything permissions, when you could omit You can't bypass permission verification by granting FullTrust, so this > checking altogether with the FullTrust set? isn't a good reason for a FullTrust grant. There are, however, several potentially valid reasons for choosing an Everything grant over a FullTrust grant, including: 1. You don't want to grant the assembly SecurityPermission\SkipVerification. 2. You don't want to automatically grant the assembly potentially unknown custom permissions that might have been installed by other software. 3. You don't want the assembly to pass demands for FullTrust (including the LinkDemands generated when attempting to call into a strongly named assembly not marked by AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute). That said, there are several "dangerous" permissions included in the Everything set that you might also want to deny to assemblies that meet any of these criteria. However, as a built-in permission set, Everything is not modifiable. Therefore, in practice, one might prefer to assign a custom permission set that includes a few less permissions than Everything. Show quoteHide quote > > Thanks, > Jeppe D. Jespersen > Denmark > > >
X509 digital certificate for offline solution
MD5 or SHA1 or ??? How to send certificate for client authentication? String to byte[] & back using Base64 IIS Delegation Create an Event Log on a Least Privilege User Account Extra '\0' chars after decryption asp.net err Password Recovery form page... Change a windows user's password with C#? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||