|
security
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Help me to understand ??Dear all,
I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this study I am face to different example which connect to database within a ServicedComponent.. My question is what is the adavantang of using this ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, Application messaging, database transaction....? In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows Service ? regards serge If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I would say very
little. The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to control who can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is more or less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. /Claus Show quoteHide quote "serge calderara" wrote: > Dear all, > > I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this study I am > face to different example which connect to database within a > ServicedComponent.. > > My question is what is the adavantang of using this ServicedComponent > features if no interest on Object pooling, Application messaging, database > transaction....? > > In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows Service ? > > regards > serge Could Windows service can do the same as well ?
Show quoteHide quote "Claus Konrad" wrote: > If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I would say very > little. > The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to control who > can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is more or > less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. > > /Claus > > "serge calderara" wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this study I am > > face to different example which connect to database within a > > ServicedComponent.. > > > > My question is what is the adavantang of using this ServicedComponent > > features if no interest on Object pooling, Application messaging, database > > transaction....? > > > > In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows Service ? > > > > regards > > serge no - this is COM+ specific.
But you can implement the same functionality using AzMan (as metioned before) Have a look at this: http://www.leastprivilege.com/AnotherWayOfIntegratingAzMan.aspx --- Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor http://www.leastprivilege.com Show quoteHide quote > Could Windows service can do the same as well ? > > "Claus Konrad" wrote: > >> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I would >> say very >> little. >> The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to control >> who >> can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is >> more or >> less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. >> /Claus >> >> "serge calderara" wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this >>> study I am face to different example which connect to database >>> within a ServicedComponent.. >>> >>> My question is what is the adavantang of using this >>> ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, >>> Application messaging, database transaction....? >>> >>> In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows >>> Service ? >>> >>> regards >>> serge What is this AzMan about ?
A hand made class on top of satandard .Net pincipal ?? Show quoteHide quote "Dominick Baier" wrote: > no - this is COM+ specific. > > But you can implement the same functionality using AzMan (as metioned before) > > Have a look at this: > > http://www.leastprivilege.com/AnotherWayOfIntegratingAzMan.aspx > > --- > Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor > http://www.leastprivilege.com > > > Could Windows service can do the same as well ? > > > > "Claus Konrad" wrote: > > > >> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I would > >> say very > >> little. > >> The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to control > >> who > >> can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is > >> more or > >> less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. > >> /Claus > >> > >> "serge calderara" wrote: > >> > >>> Dear all, > >>> > >>> I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this > >>> study I am face to different example which connect to database > >>> within a ServicedComponent.. > >>> > >>> My question is what is the adavantang of using this > >>> ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, > >>> Application messaging, database transaction....? > >>> > >>> In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows > >>> Service ? > >>> > >>> regards > >>> serge > > > well "handmade" by Microsoft ;)
--- Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor http://www.leastprivilege.com Show quoteHide quote > What is this AzMan about ? > A hand made class on top of satandard .Net pincipal ?? > "Dominick Baier" wrote: > >> no - this is COM+ specific. >> >> But you can implement the same functionality using AzMan (as metioned >> before) >> >> Have a look at this: >> >> http://www.leastprivilege.com/AnotherWayOfIntegratingAzMan.aspx >> >> --- >> Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor >> http://www.leastprivilege.com >>> Could Windows service can do the same as well ? >>> >>> "Claus Konrad" wrote: >>> >>>> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I >>>> would >>>> say very >>>> little. >>>> The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to >>>> control >>>> who >>>> can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is >>>> more or >>>> less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. >>>> /Claus >>>> "serge calderara" wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this >>>>> study I am face to different example which connect to database >>>>> within a ServicedComponent.. >>>>> >>>>> My question is what is the adavantang of using this >>>>> ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, >>>>> Application messaging, database transaction....? >>>>> >>>>> In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows >>>>> Service ? >>>>> >>>>> regards >>>>> serge Ha oki...
What does it offer more than exisiting stuff ? Show quoteHide quote "Dominick Baier" wrote: > well "handmade" by Microsoft ;) > > --- > Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor > http://www.leastprivilege.com > > > What is this AzMan about ? > > A hand made class on top of satandard .Net pincipal ?? > > "Dominick Baier" wrote: > > > >> no - this is COM+ specific. > >> > >> But you can implement the same functionality using AzMan (as metioned > >> before) > >> > >> Have a look at this: > >> > >> http://www.leastprivilege.com/AnotherWayOfIntegratingAzMan.aspx > >> > >> --- > >> Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor > >> http://www.leastprivilege.com > >>> Could Windows service can do the same as well ? > >>> > >>> "Claus Konrad" wrote: > >>> > >>>> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I > >>>> would > >>>> say very > >>>> little. > >>>> The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to > >>>> control > >>>> who > >>>> can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is > >>>> more or > >>>> less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. > >>>> /Claus > >>>> "serge calderara" wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Dear all, > >>>>> > >>>>> I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this > >>>>> study I am face to different example which connect to database > >>>>> within a ServicedComponent.. > >>>>> > >>>>> My question is what is the adavantang of using this > >>>>> ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, > >>>>> Application messaging, database transaction....? > >>>>> > >>>>> In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows > >>>>> Service ? > >>>>> > >>>>> regards > >>>>> serge > > >
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnnetserv/html/AzManApps.asp
--- Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor http://www.leastprivilege.com Show quoteHide quote > Ha oki... > What does it offer more than exisiting stuff ? > "Dominick Baier" wrote: > >> well "handmade" by Microsoft ;) >> >> --- >> Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor >> http://www.leastprivilege.com >>> What is this AzMan about ? >>> A hand made class on top of satandard .Net pincipal ?? >>> "Dominick Baier" wrote: >>>> no - this is COM+ specific. >>>> >>>> But you can implement the same functionality using AzMan (as >>>> metioned before) >>>> >>>> Have a look at this: >>>> >>>> http://www.leastprivilege.com/AnotherWayOfIntegratingAzMan.aspx >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor >>>> http://www.leastprivilege.com >>>>> Could Windows service can do the same as well ? >>>>> >>>>> "Claus Konrad" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I >>>>>> would >>>>>> say very >>>>>> little. >>>>>> The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to >>>>>> control >>>>>> who >>>>>> can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It >>>>>> is >>>>>> more or >>>>>> less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. >>>>>> /Claus >>>>>> "serge calderara" wrote: >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this >>>>>>> study I am face to different example which connect to database >>>>>>> within a ServicedComponent.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My question is what is the adavantang of using this >>>>>>> ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, >>>>>>> Application messaging, database transaction....? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows >>>>>>> Service ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> regards >>>>>>> serge 
Other interesting topics
CASPOL - StrongName trusts not being applied
CAS and Strong Named EntLib 2.0 Assemblies Any Obfuscator can hide the Key & iv? Thread.CurrentPrincipal only set once strong name validation failed problem Trusting a location for Framework 2.x XML files and .Net, digital signatures, WebService Security how to use microsoft application blocks ent lib june 2005 UserControl on Web Page - can I use dependent assemblies on client interop assembly requiring full trust |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
