|
security
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Linking to a password protected BE from FEHi everybody,
I have a FE & BE system in access 2007, I would like to protect the BE from ever being opened but still link from the FE to the BE..can this be done?? I tried to protect the BE but then I cannot connect to it. Any help would be appreciated Ryan "Ryis" <R***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message There'd be no logic to protecting your BE if you could then just connect to news:AE6650E6-7B14-4BD4-800A-137D610D246B@microsoft.com... > Hi everybody, > > I have a FE & BE system in access 2007, I would like to protect the BE > from > ever being opened but still link from the FE to the BE..can this be done?? > I > tried to protect the BE but then I cannot connect to it. > > Any help would be appreciated > it from another file. What you need to do is connect to it whilst joined to your custom workgroup. Keith. www.keithwilby.co.uk Not sure how to do this. Right now i am setting up the server to connect on
windows logon with permissionn rights. Is this the same as you are talking about. My users can only connect when they have logged into windows with the right credentials from within our vpn "Ryis" <R***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message When you apply ULS you join a custom workgroup using a custom *.mdw file. news:ED54B712-EDC7-4D5A-9590-2CE86AB40201@microsoft.com... > Not sure how to do this. Right now i am setting up the server to connect > on > windows logon with permissionn rights. Is this the same as you are > talking > about. My users can only connect when they have logged into windows with > the > right credentials from within our vpn > > This is the process I'm referring to and is independent of the Windows login process. Keith. www.keithwilby.co.uk Keith,
I thought... unless he was using Access 2007 which is no longer available in 2007. Only using Access 2003 or lower with 2007 can you have the benefit of a workgroup file. Or am I wrong? -- Show quoteHide quoteGina Whipp "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors II http://www.regina-whipp.com/index.htm "Keith Wilby" <h***@there.com> wrote in message news:496f14d4$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net... > "Ryis" <R***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:AE6650E6-7B14-4BD4-800A-137D610D246B@microsoft.com... >> Hi everybody, >> >> I have a FE & BE system in access 2007, I would like to protect the BE >> from >> ever being opened but still link from the FE to the BE..can this be >> done?? I >> tried to protect the BE but then I cannot connect to it. >> >> Any help would be appreciated >> > > There'd be no logic to protecting your BE if you could then just connect > to it from another file. What you need to do is connect to it whilst > joined to your custom workgroup. > > Keith. > www.keithwilby.co.uk "Gina Whipp" <NotInteres***@InViruses.com> wrote in If you mean that using an MDB you can use ULS, yes, that's correct.news:ubjfAL2dJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl: > I thought... unless he was using Access 2007 which is no longer > available in 2007. Only using Access 2003 or lower with 2007 can > you have the benefit of a workgroup file. Or am I wrong? But MDB is a native A2K7 format, not an A2K3 format. A2K7 can make an MDB without any difficulty. It is only when you make an ACCDB that you cannot use ULS. David,
You know I never noticed that MDB is the native A2K7 format. I guess I need to play more. But, yes, I was wondering because of the way Keith said it and I thought I got that wrong. Thanks for clearing that up. -- Show quoteHide quoteGina Whipp "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors II http://www.regina-whipp.com/index.htm "David W. Fenton" <XXXuse***@dfenton.com.invalid> wrote in message news:Xns9B94CD7A47D1f99a49ed1d0c49c5bbb2@74.209.136.94... > "Gina Whipp" <NotInteres***@InViruses.com> wrote in > news:ubjfAL2dJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl: > >> I thought... unless he was using Access 2007 which is no longer >> available in 2007. Only using Access 2003 or lower with 2007 can >> you have the benefit of a workgroup file. Or am I wrong? > > If you mean that using an MDB you can use ULS, yes, that's correct. > But MDB is a native A2K7 format, not an A2K3 format. A2K7 can make > an MDB without any difficulty. It is only when you make an ACCDB > that you cannot use ULS. > > -- > David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/ > usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/ "Gina Whipp" <NotInteres***@InViruses.com> wrote in Not *THE* native format, but *A* native format, just as in A2K3, A2Knews:#Ivbfs3dJHA.3520@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl: > You know I never noticed that MDB is the native A2K7 format. format is a native format for A2K3. > I guess I need The point is that all Jet 4 MDBs can be run natively in A2K7 without> to play more. But, yes, I was wondering because of the way Keith > said it and I thought I got that wrong. Thanks for clearing that > up. conversion. That means an A2K, A2K2 or A2K3 MDB, or an MDB created in whichever format in A2K7. --
Gina Whipp "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors II http://www.regina-whipp.com/index.htm "David W. Fenton" <XXXuse***@dfenton.com.invalid> wrote in message Okay, got that...news:Xns9B95A6FDE9B39f99a49ed1d0c49c5bbb2@74.209.136.97... > "Gina Whipp" <NotInteres***@InViruses.com> wrote in > news:#Ivbfs3dJHA.3520@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl: > >> You know I never noticed that MDB is the native A2K7 format. > > Not *THE* native format, but *A* native format, just as in A2K3, A2K > format is a native format for A2K3. > That I new, as I said it was the WAY Keith said it.>> I guess I need >> to play more. But, yes, I was wondering because of the way Keith >> said it and I thought I got that wrong. Thanks for clearing that >> up. > > The point is that all Jet 4 MDBs can be run natively in A2K7 without > conversion. That means an A2K, A2K2 or A2K3 MDB, or an MDB created > in whichever format in A2K7. Show quoteHide quote > > -- > David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/ > usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/ "Gina Whipp" <NotInteres***@InViruses.com> wrote in message Provided that you retain the mdb file format you can still use a workgroup.news:ubjfAL2dJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Keith, > > I thought... unless he was using Access 2007 which is no longer available > in 2007. Only using Access 2003 or lower with 2007 can you have the > benefit of a workgroup file. Or am I wrong? > Keith. I knew that but the way you said... that wasn't evident. So I wanted to
make sure I wasn't mistaken OR that something hadn't changed since the last time I peeked! -- Show quoteHide quoteGina Whipp "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors II http://www.regina-whipp.com/index.htm "Keith Wilby" <h***@there.com> wrote in message news:4974382d_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net... > "Gina Whipp" <NotInteres***@InViruses.com> wrote in message > news:ubjfAL2dJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> Keith, >> >> I thought... unless he was using Access 2007 which is no longer >> available in 2007. Only using Access 2003 or lower with 2007 can you >> have the benefit of a workgroup file. Or am I wrong? >> > > Provided that you retain the mdb file format you can still use a > workgroup. > > Keith.  
Other interesting topics
BE/ FE Question
vba opendatabase readonly record level lock access 2002 can't disable shift key with faq_DisableShiftKeyBypass function Security Problem When Linking Tables Secure part of a db? recordset not updatabale ACCDE RWOP and passing variables to a function Change Ownership of Database Object (?) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
